Author Archives: herault

Starting with ULFM-1.0, the implementation features a purely logarithmic agreement, with no single point of failure. A paper presenting this implementation will be presented during SC’15. We considered a practical agreement algorithm with the following desired properties: the unique decided value is the result of a combination of all values proposed by deciding processes (a major difference with a 1-set agreement), failures consist of permanent crashes in a pseudo-synchronous system (no data corruption, loss of message, or malicious behaviors are considered), the agreement favors the failure-free performance over the failure case, striving to exchange a logarithmic number of messages in the absence of failures. To satisfy this last requirement, we introduced a practical, intermediate property, called Early Returning: that is the capacity of an early deciding algorithm to return before the stopping condition (early or not) is guaranteed: as soon as a process can determine that the decision value is fixed (except if it fails itself), the process is allowed to return. However, because the process is allowed to return early, later failures may compel that process to participate in additional communications.  Therefore, the decision must remain available after the processes return, in order to serve unexpected message exchanges until the stopping condition can be established. Unlike a regular early stopping algorithm, not all processes decide and Continue reading Logarithmic Agreement Routine→